<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon WP-DC31 Waterproof Case for SD780IS Digital Elph Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waterproofdigitalcamerareview.com/2009/07/canon-wp-dc31-waterproof-case-for-sd780is-digital-elph-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waterproofdigitalcamerareview.com/2009/07/canon-wp-dc31-waterproof-case-for-sd780is-digital-elph-camera/</link>
	<description>Waterproof Digital Camera Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:15:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ximena</title>
		<link>http://waterproofdigitalcamerareview.com/2009/07/canon-wp-dc31-waterproof-case-for-sd780is-digital-elph-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Ximena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waterproofdigitalcamerareview.com/152/canon-wp-dc31-waterproof-case-for-sd780is-digital-elph-camera/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>&lt;/div&gt;

This is the second underwater housing unit for a canon digital camera that I&#039;ve had.  I bought this just in time for a 1 week cruise to the caribbean and got a lot of use out of it.  It does pretty much what it says it does, nothing to surprising, but a couple of improvements since the last one I had (for my Powershot S50):&#13;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;- size.  Obviously the camera is smaller, so the housing is going to be smaller, but still, I give credit to Canon for making the housing no bigger than it has to be so you can still enjoy the relative small size you bought the camera for&#13;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;- Clarity. This is an improvement of both the case and the camera itself, but w/ my old one, the LCD screen could very hard to see even in clear Caribbean waters.  The plastic on this case seems a bit more trnaslucent, possibly thinner due to it&#039;s overall size.  The improved LCD on the SD 780IS (which is fantastic by the way, along w/ the camera itself) also helps.  Either way, it&#039;s much easier to see what you&#039;re about to shoot.  I was able to get some great shots w/ it.  If I can remember, I&#039;ll try to post some examples.&#13;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;- Flash Diffuser.  I recently took a course in photography and have learned a lot about lighting , including the benefits of a diffuser, so was very happy to see that this housing has one, which the old one did not.  It&#039;s amazing how much difference it makes!! All the shots which required a flash look naturally lit, none of the harsh defined shadows I would get before.  This can be the difference between a beautiful shot and one that gets deleted.  Also, keep in mind that this camera housing is also useful above water too, for times when you take it to the beach and just want to protect the camera - I took a lot of land shots where the diffuser really helped the flash as well.&#13;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Overall, if you like to SCUBA dive, snorkel, or any other activity needing protection from the water, this is a must have!! Do not waste your time and money on cheap disposable underwater cameras that can&#039;t come close to the quality the SD 780 can deliver.  By the time you do that a couple of times, and get your film developed, your well on your way to buying this case and having MUCH better pictures (not to mention video) to show for it.
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second underwater housing unit for a canon digital camera that I&#8217;ve had.  I bought this just in time for a 1 week cruise to the caribbean and got a lot of use out of it.  It does pretty much what it says it does, nothing to surprising, but a couple of improvements since the last one I had (for my Powershot S50):&#13;</p>
<p>- size.  Obviously the camera is smaller, so the housing is going to be smaller, but still, I give credit to Canon for making the housing no bigger than it has to be so you can still enjoy the relative small size you bought the camera for&#13;</p>
<p>- Clarity. This is an improvement of both the case and the camera itself, but w/ my old one, the LCD screen could very hard to see even in clear Caribbean waters.  The plastic on this case seems a bit more trnaslucent, possibly thinner due to it&#8217;s overall size.  The improved LCD on the SD 780IS (which is fantastic by the way, along w/ the camera itself) also helps.  Either way, it&#8217;s much easier to see what you&#8217;re about to shoot.  I was able to get some great shots w/ it.  If I can remember, I&#8217;ll try to post some examples.&#13;</p>
<p>- Flash Diffuser.  I recently took a course in photography and have learned a lot about lighting , including the benefits of a diffuser, so was very happy to see that this housing has one, which the old one did not.  It&#8217;s amazing how much difference it makes!! All the shots which required a flash look naturally lit, none of the harsh defined shadows I would get before.  This can be the difference between a beautiful shot and one that gets deleted.  Also, keep in mind that this camera housing is also useful above water too, for times when you take it to the beach and just want to protect the camera &#8211; I took a lot of land shots where the diffuser really helped the flash as well.&#13;</p>
<p>Overall, if you like to SCUBA dive, snorkel, or any other activity needing protection from the water, this is a must have!! Do not waste your time and money on cheap disposable underwater cameras that can&#8217;t come close to the quality the SD 780 can deliver.  By the time you do that a couple of times, and get your film developed, your well on your way to buying this case and having MUCH better pictures (not to mention video) to show for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>




